It has become a tradition to criticise politicians; disgracing and humiliating them with the most inappropriate, unethical and abusive labels. It's fine, every individual is free to express and share what he experiences and feels, but why don't they criticise those who had been equally sharing the throne with politicians? Why don't they fulminate those who abrogated the constitution and torn us asunder through fanaticism? The best way,for a nation, to flourish is to break the fragile wall of illusions and realistically realise the weaknesses and vulnerabilities. Without Diagnosing disease how could one be cured?For those who shrug and believe it was only the past that should be burried now; Eugene O'Neill writes, "Past is present,isn't it? It's future too". Past will continue to haunt the present untill and unless the policy makers choose the road that has not been taken before( overhauling of old and outdated policies).
(The Pakistani version of revolution) Demagogues will continue their demagoguery until and unless the nation asks them why don't your own children need these revolutions,changes and Islam.They are humiliating the sacredness and highness which is attributed to revolution.The Pakistani version of revolution needs to be added in oxford dictionary which would mean;to fool the masses in order to rule over them. How would a person revolutionise the nation when he himself doesn't think this land worth living.On the one hand politicians enjoy the privileges of dual nationlities in developd countries like Canada and UK,on the other hand they claim for change and revolution.Had they been so sincere and honest,they would have changed the system.Why would one change the system or at least try for its betterment when he himself enjoys all the facilities and privileges abroad.Why would one enlighten the nation by introducing the revolutionary steps in education sector when his o...
Comments
Post a Comment